Case Studies · Outcomes Drawn From Real Engagements

Each case below summarises the situation, the action taken by the team, the outcome, and the timeframe. Names and identifying details are anonymised for privacy. Results vary by property condition, market timing, and owner decisions — these are reference patterns, not guarantees.

Case 01 · Sukhumvit one-bedroom · re-positioning

• Situation · 35 sqm condo asking 8% above the comparable band; listed for 4 months with 3 viewings, no offers.
• Action · Re-shot photography against the unit’s actual selling angle (skyline view + workspace fit), produced a tenant-profile-led description, repriced to the realistic mid-band, opened to multi-channel listings.
• Outcome · Lease signed in 3 weeks at the targeted asking rent · 18-month term · screened tenant from a regional employer.

Case 02 · Two-unit owner · moving from yield drift to system

• Situation · Owner managing both units personally; rents below market, growing maintenance backlog, no monthly numbers.
• Action · Took over both units · introduced standardised reporting · cleared maintenance backlog over 6 weeks · re-priced both leases at renewal.
• Outcome · Net annualised rental income up materially · owner shifted from operations to allocation decisions.

Case 03 · Off-shore investor · disposal advisory

• Situation · Foreign-resident owner holding a townhouse over a hold period that no longer fit the original investment thesis; uncertain whether to renovate, hold, or sell.
• Action · Comparable transaction review · renovation ROI model · hold-vs-sell scenario at 12 / 24 / 36 months · concluded sale timing recommendation.
• Outcome · Property listed at the recommended price · closed within the targeted window.

Case 04 · Buyer-side advisory · project comparison

• Situation · Buyer evaluating three new-build projects on similar locations and prices; sales teams competing for booking.
• Action · Side-by-side memo covering pricing per sqm, demand drivers, developer record, expected rent range, and exit liquidity for each.
• Outcome · Buyer selected the project with the strongest rental fit · declined a heavily promoted alternative that the memo flagged on supply pipeline.

Note on figures

Some details have been omitted or rounded to protect client confidentiality. Specific reference calls can be arranged at a later stage of an engagement, with prior consent from the relevant client.